American psychologist John Holden arrives in London to participate in a symposium aiming to expose witchcraft and devil-worship as a fraud, with attention centered on a cult run by a Julian Karswell. Debarking his plane, Holden learns that the symposium leader, Henry Harrington, has suddenly died and he is now in charge. What only the audience knows is that Harrington was clearly killed by a demon, apparently summoned by Karswell to avenge his persecution. Despite both threatening and cajoling behavior by Karswell, Holden determines to proceed, though the only cult member willing to talk about his experiences is in a prison psychiatric ward, catatonic after allegedly killing yet another cult member. However, Harrington's niece, Joanna, believes, based on her uncle's notes, that Karswell may indeed have some satanic powers derived from an ancient tome in an obscure language which he has been able to translate, and attempts to warn the skeptic Holden. Karswell's mother also attempts to warn Holden off. However, the thing which begins to most get to Holden are the occasional, but mounting, sensory and mental disturbances he begins experiencing after an encounter with Karswell, and the discovery that, during this encounter, Karswell secretly slipped a slip of parchment with a curse in runic symbols on it into Holden's belongings, a parchment identical to one Harrington recorded having had passed to him in a similar manner shortly before his death... [N.B. Holden at no point stays at the Karswell estate].
人类还是多学习怎么告别吧，逃避可耻，反对复制
最佳风景和室内装修片。看完4K HDR真的很多帧都可以做壁纸。
当近端科幻切入到人文关怀与家庭伦理这样的敏感题材，胜在处理的细腻真挚。那在任何一段关系中，被人替代总是不好受的。
洗脑片，为明显存在道德问题的科技应用做意识形态的铺路，看不明白么？
看片过程中一直想看看编导会怎么安排本体与义体真正互换的瞬间以及义体如何回归家庭 回归早了 那就还是《第六日》 还是《真实的谎言》 事实上 尽管有许多手段上的加持 比如这其实是一部打着科幻外衣的家庭片 一部在故事上并没有新意的科幻电影 以及导演在叙事上更侧重表现人物的意识流插叙 回忆段落的无序似乎给了影片叙事一些“高级感” 但由于题材的局限和背景的架空 它又无法讨论到那些关乎生命的根本命题 可以感觉到编导在文艺片与类型片之间的平衡拿捏 他很努力的想提升电影呈现的人性切面 但如果科幻电影没有科幻概念上的升级 那么一切只能是挂羊头卖狗肉 今年的欧美科幻电影创作也正好与现实世界的科技瓶颈呼应 尽管相比2000年有了更以假乱真的特效 但还是在重复20年前的科技概念 即使是苹果制作
对结尾比较失望，我还以为有什么反转，结果就是想单纯的引起思考？问题是片中思考太肤浅，不够深入，披着科幻的剧情片，然而探讨却是隔靴搔痒。
很苹果 很近的未来，总觉得这样的探讨很有意思
（但是说实话，我接受不了这种事）
他家人如果知道真相后会心碎死。永远不知道真相才可以
3.5分 每一个道具都在我的审美点上，但过于煽情和拖沓，故事线过于简单且直白，可能我已经是个肮脏的大人了吧
“不需要看剧情，看画面，看风景，看室内装饰，装修了。” 这是什么评论？看电影不需要看剧情？
但人啊 越长大就越懒得站在主观立场上说太多 碰不到想法一样的人是正常 碰到了是会心一笑
然后被想念或者遗忘
人之所以区别于动物就在于知伦理明道德 但同时人也是最自私的动物
For you I could do anything. Look me in the eyes and tell me you love me. Always have. and Always will. Take care of them. 开车这种费神费力的事情，交给AI不是更好吗？如果我不在了，请照顾好TA们，另一个我。只要TA不知道的话。
虽然，但是，克隆技术违背人伦道德，还是不要变成现实，否则，太可怕了。
抛开伦理道德，爱绵长永存。与其说是伦理道德的博弈，不如说是人性与爱的较量。男主的每一个决定，反应，包括克隆人jack的每一个反馈和思想，都是人类内心深处关于自私的人性与爱的衡量。理解卡梅隆即将孤独死去无助愤怒的情绪，也理解jack惶恐，害怕，对未来不确定性表现出的惊恐乞求可怜的眼神。如果未来真的能做到indistinguishable，那么唯爱永生。
克隆人研究因为伦理问题戛然而止，电影把这个命题放在垂死之人的选择下。若你知道自己生命将至，而生者还有很长的路要走，那么你是否愿意接受被挚爱之人遗忘，独自承受孤独恐惧痛苦，而把欢乐希望幸福留给他们呢？卡梅隆回到家里，看到一切安好，跟孩子和妻子做了最后的告别，那段真的很感人。I love you，always have，and always will。
太太太慢了，看了都想睡觉。奥卡菲娜被骂黑人文化挪用是真的有原因，台词一股Rap味，整个人格格不入。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
