Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
谁是谁都忘差不多了结果熟悉的钢琴一响起又都想起来了。葬礼和新生的交替完成了新时代的更迭。算是非常完满的Happy Ending了。
以婚礼开始，以葬礼结束。从无声电影到有声电影的转变，以及老奶奶的离世，都呼应了标题，唐顿庄园的new era的开始。
像《唐顿庄园》这样，见证一部英剧在国内种草、风靡、流于平庸，又余音不绝的经历，已经绝版。所以在银幕和一群老朋友重逢，也很幸福。影版本身也没有让人失望，独立成章的故事起码要比最后两三季的生拉硬扯体面很多。
【B+】不负期待😚加菲的歌喉让人印象深刻了！
像《唐顿庄园》这样，见证一部英剧在国内种草、风靡、流于平庸，又余音不绝的经历，已经绝版。所以在银幕和一群老朋友重逢，也很幸福。影版本身也没有让人失望，独立成章的故事起码要比最后两三季的生拉硬扯体面很多。
穿着戏服岁月静好地过家家，那就好好告个别吧。试图在时间的灰尘里看到优雅。有些可以move on，可有些注定老去。新时代来了，不如适时停下，在破碎的时代来临前，葬礼与新生，或许是这个童话最好的结局
虽说是新时代到来，传承的精神和两代掌舵人会做的选择是一样的，这可能是我没那么买账的原因。
但是后面的几个人疯狂的在打哈欠……
一个时代的落幕。Mary也许会成为另一个granny，但没有人可以替代这一个granny。
看的上头了，哈哈哈哈，风格太文艺了吧。这一部没想到老爷还认了个兄弟，还多了套房，哈哈哈哈哈。删了六分钟txl剧情，对剧情没任何影响，最可惜的是老太太走了，看不到斗嘴了🤐
大小姐还是每部戏都有新艳遇呀！这一部感觉直接承接了电视剧第一部的情感，那些没有说出口的，都说出来没有遗憾了。门槛也挺低的，很多时候台词巧妙地把人物或者前事介绍了。其实想不到电影会这么精彩，特别现在疫情又收紧了，渝北区都关了，还能在IFS的百丽宫看超前点映，很开心。就是坐的3号厅 整体位置都偏低了 加上百丽宫是凹面屏 屏幕尺寸中等，而电影太多广角镜头，看起来形变比较严重。
应该不会再有续集了吧。几乎每个人都得到了happy ending
看电影的感觉真好，短短两个小时，却能把我拉回过去的时光，缓慢的，一集一集追剧的日子，把2022年的世界隔离开来，像过了几年一样漫长。 Downton Abbey可以永远不用变，永远在那里，永远old school，一板一眼。婚礼开始，葬礼结束，死亡又新生，这就是我曾经的热爱了。ps,古迪子这次连酱油也不打了。
夸一波编剧，巧借电影镜头让下人上楼穿上华服过把主人瘾，安排帅哥明星把走男仆留下好结局，众生相完美圆满；骂一波编剧，为何如此绝情写死老太太，为何不请大表哥三小姐来个回忆杀，影迷就想要太多。请唐家屯继续拍下去吧，毕竟那些遗忘的、温情的、可爱的、幽默的、讽刺的、优雅的英伦范儿值得一席之地。
于我而言算是这两个月最好的院线电影了，虽然可能情怀分就占了一半。如果说摩登家庭算是美国“亲戚”的话，唐家屯就是我的英国“亲戚”，能知道他们的“近况”，哪怕是干看他们坐着聊天我都能满足。剧情两条线，总的还是些日常琐碎，还没上一部国王来访噱头足，中间还有死去的大表哥突然出现攻击我……而本来上一部电影最后那个托孤就有预感，以为这次会以葬礼开头，没想到编剧把它放在了结尾。另外最后想知道的是，托马斯那条线删了多少，到最后离开庄园的原因都圆不回来了。
3.5星。把每个人都写活了，几次让我想起《红楼梦》。 保守与时尚的交融，高贵与平凡的碰撞，充满爱的一大家子。对欧洲来说，一个最好的时代，也是几百年地理大发现、殖民财富积累的结果。
唐顿很奇妙，本身是怀旧，却又能看到时代的变迁
始于婚礼 终于葬礼 时代远去 让我安静的死去
虽然演员外貌看都老了一些，但是气质这个东西真的是不惧年龄，永远那么优雅夺目，就是欣赏Lady Mary: I like them handsome. 这一部结合20s电影talkie的崛起，很有意思。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
