负子蟾超恶心图片

负子蟾超恶心图片 高清

评分：
9.0 推荐

分类： 剧情片 2010

导演： 刘易斯·艾伦

立即播放 报错
排序

播放地址

剧情介绍

　　Novelist Joseph Shearing specialized in using real cases which took place in Victorian England, altering them for fictional purposes. MOSS ROSE in 1947 was the first film to be made from his novels, then in 1948 two of his works were adapted for the screen, this film and THE MARK OF CAIN. The movie stars Todd as a recently widowed missionary returning to her home in England from Jamaica. During the voyage, she meets Milland, a charming though dangerous rascal who is wanted by police in connection with some unsavory dealings. Milland contracts malaria while onboard the ship and Todd nurses him back to health. In London, Todd settles into her home, taking in boarders to make ends meet. Milland arrives, moves in, and proclaims his love for her. Todd is thrilled, but it seems rather obvious that Milland is only toying with her. Milland finds some letters written to her by her friend, Fitzgerald, in which Fitzgerald reveals some of her sexual indiscretions. Since Fitzgerald is now married to the wealthy Huntley, Milland believes he can use the letters to blackmail Fitzgerald. Todd's love for Milland is so great that she goes along with the plan. Huntley, however, learns of the scheme and also uncovers details of Milland's shady past. Fearing for her lover's safety, Todd poisons Huntley, then remains silent when Fitzgerald is arrested for the murder. Milland has by now genuinely fallen in love with Todd and the two make plans to leave England. Before they can depart, one of Milland's former lovers shows up and Todd, in a jealous rage, kills Milland, then turns herself into the police.
　　This is an intriguing film, although a little on the talky side. The performances are excellent throughout, with Milland shining as the cad, the type of role in which he excelled. Though he spent most of his time making films in the US, he occasionally returned to his native England for a production and this was his first British film since FRENCH WITHOUT TEARS in 1939. Director Allen was also an Englishman who chose to work in the US, this being his first directorial effort in his homeland. This was the fourth and last time Milland and Allen would work together, their pairing having begun in 1944 with the wonderfully eerie THE UNINVITED.

猜你喜欢

评论:

  • 雅倩 7小时前 :

    hello to whoever you are

  • 瑞帝 0小时前 :

    美国这类真实事件改编的电影跟非虚构文学一样，细节考究，但是太冗长，看得缺乏代入感。然而豆瓣用户就喜欢给这种电影打高分，其实是给“民主”打高分。

  • 有玉兰 3小时前 :

    物质基础和上层建筑缺一不可，他们没有物质基础，上层建筑也没整明白。无论是从政，还是culture revolution都没办法带来真正的改变。

  • 祁雁 5小时前 :

    开场蒙太奇交代背景；倾向性过于明显；https://www.history.com/news/chicago-8-trial-importance；回去重看社网；芝加哥10 (2007)；

  • 馨桂 0小时前 :

    隔离，灾难，剧院，都让我眼泪汪汪。世界戏剧节快乐，早日剧院见🙏

  • 祥骞 0小时前 :

    疫情封控真的改变了人的很多心态，好像更能和剧里的人感同身受了。我很喜欢这部音乐剧，从情节设置、视角选取到几支令人印象深刻的歌（包括集体祈祷、女机长自述、酒吧狂欢），好像在看一部用轻松释怀悲伤的轻纪录片一样。在人道主义灾难，只有人道主义能释慰一切。而人道主义从来不是靠嘴上说说。没有人是孤岛，每个人都值得拥有食物、支持和尊重，面对你的一份小小的关怀和善意，未来也许有更伟大的回报和羁绊。911改变了一切，有些东西永久的失去了，但有些东西也被重新发现和评估了。如同疫情一样。最后，希望有生之年能去一趟newfoundland。

  • 祁逸凡 9小时前 :

    发生在那个万恶的美国？

  • 谢书艺 5小时前 :

    在很多方面点到为止，种族歧视、检控官的不情愿、政治斗争、善意的冲动…剧作能把这所有紧张又抓人地交织在一起，最基本的原因是现实足够魔幻。看得令人汗颜，哎！

  • 枚听枫 9小时前 :

    剪辑凌厉（但有一处扰乱故事线然而，宣讲、开庭相接，会造成奔赴芝加哥受审的错觉，实际情况是抗议后被捕、被告）。

  • 楷树 2小时前 :

    庭审戏是精华，影片的真正魅力却不单单局限于替左派发声，更是对美国司法体制的完美演绎——你首先是一位公民，其次才是人民。

  • 素小宸 3小时前 :

    美式抓壮丁我惊了；论老白男和老黄男谁更恶心；小雀斑的角色和他在罗琳事件中如出一辙。民运真的很容易被利用。光明与黑暗的角逐永不会停息。

  • 肖安阳 7小时前 :

    The whole world is WATCHING!!!

  • 绳嘉熙 9小时前 :

    暖心的故事，很感动。剧情精彩，音乐顺耳，表演精湛。看完这电影（音乐剧），谁能不想去newfoundland呢

  • 章佳昂雄 0小时前 :

    牛逼，大爱！虽然艾伦索金有把这部电影，按照新闻编辑室、白宫风云来拍的嫌疑，但不重要。首先这是我最喜欢、完全没有抵抗力的法庭戏，更重要的是借美国历史上的真实事件，拍出了四年来好莱坞对川普政权最强的控诉和警示。从总统司法部法官到警察，说的是尼克松政府，但无一不是对应川普政府，对应当今的美国。最后一幕，和韩国电影《辩护人》异曲同工，美国式的热血沸腾。

  • 璟玉 5小时前 :

    剧本稳中带燃，演员各有亮点，借古喻今但当下民意会不会比当初更加割裂？80

  • 贝珠雨 6小时前 :

    看这部电影犹如在上一堂课。它向我们真实呈现了1970年初大洋彼岸公民社会里真实的样子、公民社会里律师该有的样子、公民社会里的公民应有的素养；它亦是黑暗中的明灯，正当其时的出现默默慰藉着那些无依的灵魂……感谢Netflix精彩呈现，感谢“人人影视”的大神们的无私奉献，感谢黑暗中出现的那一丝丝缝隙使我们还有机会看到这么激励人心的好电影。

  • 锦枫 5小时前 :

    司法、制度和文化的差异，必然会影响我们对片中所争论的“美国价值观”的理解。但无论怎么理解，“美国价值观”都是可以被质疑的价值观，正如片中精彩的法庭戏所展示的那样。显然，这不是每个地方所宣扬的价值观都能做到的。光是对待自己国家在上世纪六七十年代的历史这点，美国电影可以一拍再拍，而有些地方的这段历史只存在于历史书轻描淡写的几页文字上，对于这些地方的人来说，上世纪六七十年代是缺失的，这种缺失必然又会反过来影响他们理解这部影片，理解现代国家。（最后，不得不说，被告站起来读越战死亡名单时，我被感动哭了。

  • 辉芦雪 9小时前 :

    女机长这段好感动🥲，连小动物也有人照料好有人文关怀哦

  • 耿浩然 0小时前 :

    其实比较期待早先传闻的斯皮尔伯格来拍艾伦·索金的这个剧本。说不定又是一部《断锁怒潮》或《林肯》。可最后还是索金自己上了，缺点和优点一样明显。他是一个顶级编剧，但仅仅是合格的导演。影片中不乏艾伦金句，“我从没因为思想被审判过”，振聋发聩的一句话在平静中更让人震撼；也不乏热血时刻，比如结尾。但和伟大尚差距离。不过对1968年产生了兴趣，想去看《乌托邦年代》。

  • 睦良工 7小时前 :

    “Do you have contempt for your government?” - "It's nothing compared to the contempt my government has for me”

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved